Career advice in law always sounded, at least to me, suspiciously like instructions for carving an absurdly intricate figurine. Despite what Suits would lead you to believe, the traditional path to success meant becoming the best at a very specialized skillset, like cross-border Sino-US antitrust law. Plant your flag, build your fortress of expertise, and wait for the world (or at least, the relevant M&A deals) to beat a path to your door.
It wasn’t always like this. Before the modern era, the polymath dominated. Leonardo da Vinci. Benjamin Franklin. Aristotle. We might be going back to the future, a future of Professional Hybrid Vigor, a future of Range (yes, this is a reference to the eponymous book).
While deep specialization built empires in the past, the future might belong to those who can connect different fields. AI can now handle vast swathes of specialized knowledge recall and complex task execution, and the competitive edge shifts. It moves towards those who can integrate disparate fields, ask the right questions across domains, and see the connections others miss. The advantage might fall less to the lone hyper-specialist and more to the multi-disciplinary solo operator or tight-knit team.
Consider Mark Watney from The Martian – a botanist and mechanical engineer who survived on Mars through sheer cross-disciplinary grit. He didn't just know plants; he knew how to jury-rig life support with duct tape and ingenuity.
Or, here’s a bit of self-promotion. Take our own products. RegAcademy is a blend of niche regulatory expertise with storytelling techniques, AI-powered media generation, and solid technology infrastructure. The result? High-quality, engaging training delivered at a price point that makes traditional providers weep.
Now, is building this kind of "hybrid vigor" easy? Does it follow a neat, linear path? Absolutely not. Look at my own background. I somehow accumulated 80 credits of Computer Science at Georgia Tech (without actually finishing the degree, naturally), then graduated pre-med at Emory, took a detour into Neuroscience (because, why not?), spent a year coding at Leica Geosystems pretending I knew what I was doing, then pivoted again into law school, followed by 12 bewildering years in finance at brokerages, then custody banks, then asset managers.
Looking back, my early resume mostly pleads temporary insanity. For years, I felt like I was perpetually collecting interesting-but-unrelated skillsets like some kind of confused academic magpie. Specialization? I was specializing in not specializing.
But here's the kicker: that chaotic, seemingly random collection of experiences is precisely what allows a tiny team like ours to operate today. That weird blend of tech, law, finance, and a dash of relentless momentum lets us understand complex problems from multiple angles. It allows us to build industry-leading, enterprise-quality solutions – the kind that usually require armies of consultants and budgets the size of a small nation's GDP – with unbelievable efficiency. We can translate between the nerds, the lawyers, and the business folks because, well, some of us are all three.
So, if your own career path looks less like a ladder and more like a Jackson Pollock painting, take heart. In an age where AI provides the depth, perhaps your breadth is no longer a bug, but a feature. Maybe that "weird" background is precisely the hybrid vigor needed to thrive.
“A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.”
― Robert A. Heinlein